|
4.4
Central and Eastern Europe
The
CEE Region accounts for 12 per cent of the world’s fatalities,
almost twice its share of population or motor vehicles (6-7%).
In terms of the number of fatalities per person, it has one of
the worst personal safety record of all the regions. While current
crash and casualty data was readily available for the region,
trend data is difficult to collect on many countries and discrepancies,
especially with motor vehicles, are frequent.
The
European Union recently funded a Phare Multi-Country Road Safety
Project that reviewed the road safety situation in 13 countries.
Crash data and sector activity was analysed as with the donor-funded
reviews in Asia and the Pacific and the Latin America and the
Caribbean studies. The summary below is based on the PHARE project
findings.
4.4.1
Current situation
The
ten countries summarised below account for about 87 percent of
the regional population. Russia clearly dominates the fatality
situation with both half of the region’s fatalities and also the
highest fatality risk. Russia’s per capita risk of dying in a
road crash is over three times that of the Ukraine’s (See table
20). Figures 9 and 10 shows the fatality risks and rates for all
CEE countries with data available.
Motorisation
ranges widely in the region with the Czech Republic reporting
near one vehicle for every two people, almost ten times that of
Azerbaijan.
Table
20 - Key indicators for Central and Eastern Europe
| |
Year
|
Road
fatalities
|
Deaths
per 100,000
pop
|
Motor
vehicles
per
1000 pop.
|
Deaths
per 10,000 motor vehicles
|
GNP
per capita
(US$)
|
|
Russia
|
1996
|
29,468
|
20
|
140
|
14
|
2,673
|
|
Poland
|
1996
|
6,359
|
17
|
291
|
6
|
3,597
|
|
Ukraine
|
1996
|
3,259
|
6
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
1,038
|
|
Romania
|
1996
|
2,845
|
13
|
140
|
9
|
1,406
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
1996
|
2,732
|
17
|
82
|
20
|
1,294
|
|
Belarus
|
1996
|
1,730
|
17
|
153
|
11
|
2,144
|
|
Czech
Republic
|
1996
|
1,386
|
13
|
457
|
3
|
5,230
|
|
Hungary
|
1996
|
1,367
|
13
|
289
|
5
|
4,489
|
|
Yugoslavia
|
1996
|
1,276
|
12
|
185
|
6
|
N/a
|
|
Bulgaria
|
1996
|
1,014
|
12
|
297
|
4
|
1,167
|
4.4.2
Recent trends
Trend
data were available for very few countries and these did not include
Russia. The recent experience of Poland is compared with that
of Azerbaijan, Lithuania, Bulgaria and Croatia in the figure below.
Quite different experiences were reported with road fatalities
rising by almost a third in Poland while they were to have decreased
by over a third in the other countries. Population changed little
with Poland reporting no change at all over the 8 year period.
Motorisation increased much faster in Poland while in the other
countries, where fatalities had decreased, the number of motor
vehicles rose by less than 1 per cent per annum
Figure
9 - Central/Eastern Europe fatality risk (1996)

Figure
10 - Central/Eastern Europe fatality rates (1996)

4.4.3
Road crash casualties
4.4.3.1
Road user type
The
Phare Study reported the overall pedestrian involvement for Eastern
European countries for which data was available at 30 per cent.
Some countries had a much higher pedestrian involvement rate,
including 50 per cent in Romania and Kazakhstan and 60 per cent
in Albania. Bus crashes were much less common (i.e. similar to
that in HMCs) with only 1-2 percent of crashes in Estonia, Latvia
and Slovenia (Phare, 1998).
4.4.3.2
Gender and age distribution
Females
accounted for 1 out of every three to four road casualties in
the region (See Table 21). Not surprisingly, the countries with
higher level of motorisation reported more female involvement
in road casualties. Females represented more casualties than fatalities.
Table
21 -Casualty distribution by gender
|
Country
|
Year
|
Casualty
type
|
Female
|
|
Russia
|
1995
|
Fatalities
only
|
25%
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
1995
|
Fatalities
only
|
24%
|
|
Bulgaria
|
1997
|
All
casualties
|
32%
|
|
Estonia
|
1997
|
All
casualties
|
34%
|
|
Latvia
|
1997
|
All
casualties
|
32%
|
|
Slovenia
|
1996
|
All
casualties
|
33%
|
There
was less of an identifiable regional pattern with the age distribution
of road casualties. Poland reported an exceptionally low rate
of children involvement while Estonia and Latvia appeared to have
a high proportion of child casualties. Working age adults (between
the age of 19and 59) accounted for between two-thirds to three
quarters of all road casualties. The age cohort experiencing the
largest number of casualties was the 30-49 year olds (See Table
22) with all five countries reporting a minimum of one quarter
of all casualties from this age group.
Table
22 - Casualty distribution by age
|
Age
|
Bulgaria
|
Estonia
|
Latvia
|
Poland
|
Slovenia
|
|
<18
|
11%
|
23%
|
24%
|
3%
|
19%
|
|
19-24
|
7%
|
17%
|
15%
|
10%
|
20%
|
|
25-29
|
16%
|
12%
|
12%
|
26%
|
13%
|
|
30-49
|
26%
|
28%
|
30%
|
25%
|
31%
|
|
50-59
|
25%
|
10%
|
9%
|
24%
|
8%
|
|
60+
|
14%
|
10%
|
11%
|
12%
|
9%
|
|