|
The Global Footwear industry has undergone major transition
during the 1990s, resulting in the transfer of global footwear
production from traditional producing countries to China, Brazil,
Indonesia and to Central & Eastern Europe.
It is noteworthy that Taiwan & Hong Kong are no
longer leading producers in their own right, but mainly sub-contract
production particularly to Thailand and Vietnam. These changes
reflect the Footwear manufacturing sensitivities to 'labour cost'.
In Europe, Romania is the only major footwear producer
with competitive labour costs to the world's leading producer
countries.
| Labour
costs in leading Footwear producing countries
|
|
Country
|
US $/hr
|
|
Korea
|
7.2
|
|
Taiwan
|
5.9
|
|
Hong Kong
|
5.4
|
|
Portugal
|
5.3
|
|
Brazil
|
1.5
|
|
Indonesia
|
0.7
|
|
Romania
|
0.7
|
|
China
|
0.6
|
|
Vietnam
|
0.6
|
|
Thailand
|
0.5
|
|
Pakistan
|
0.2
|
|
India
|
0.2
|
|
Footwear Production in CEE
Employment - '000 |
| Country |
1999 |
| Romania |
66
|
| Poland |
53
|
| Hungary |
24
|
| Czech Republic |
21
|
| Bulgaria |
20
|
| Slovak Republic |
17
|
| Slovenia |
7
|
|
Source: SATRA
The key factor behind this transition is the relatively
high level of labour content involved in the footwear manufacture
processes. Changes within the European footwear industry have
occurred rapidly over the last half of the 90s.
During the second period, from 1993-1995, following
the global recession of the previous 5 years, growth gradually
returned in these countries. However the footwear sector remained
fragile in most candidate countries and production continued to
decline – especially in Latvia and Lithuania.
For 2-3 years, production started to rise in Poland
and Hungary - but only for such gains to be lost again during
the period from 1998-2000.
The following table details of the Winners and the
Losers in the footwear production industry during the period from
1998-2000.
Footwear production trends - 1998-2000
|
|
WINNERS
|
|
Increasing Production
|
Trend
1998 - 2000
|
|
EGYPT
|
63%
|
|
INDONESIA
|
59%
|
|
VIETNAM
|
39%
|
|
RUSSIA
|
26%
|
|
MALAYSIA
|
25%
|
|
TUNISIA
|
23%
|
|
ROMANIA
|
21%
|
|
CHINA
|
16%
|
|
BRAZIL
|
13%
|
|
SYRIA
|
10%
|
|
PAKISTAN
|
6%
|
|
MEXICO
|
5%
|
|
INDIA
|
4%
|
|
PERU
|
3%
|
|
THAILAND
|
3%
|
|
COLOMBIA
|
1%
|
|
PORTUGAL
|
0%
|
|
IRAN
|
0%
|
Source: SATRA
|
|
LOSERS
|
|
Decreasing Production
|
Trend
1998 - 2000
|
|
UNITED KINGDOM
|
68%
|
|
USA
|
47%
|
|
SOUTH AFRICA
|
25%
|
|
TURKEY
|
21%
|
|
FRANCE
|
21%
|
|
TAIWAN
|
20%
|
|
JAPAN
|
20%
|
|
POLAND
|
19%
|
|
GERMANY
|
14%
|
|
PHILIPPINES
|
12%
|
|
SOUTH KOREA
|
11%
|
|
ARGENTINA
|
10%
|
|
SPAIN
|
8%
|
|
ITALY
|
8%
|
Source: SATRA
|
The leading Footwear producers of Europe in the 1980-90s
period have found it increasingly more difficult to remain competitive
on the world stage. Some countries such as Italy have more successfully
defended a high quality / high fashion market segment, whilst
losing a small percentage of 'popularly priced' product.
Italian and Portuguese producers have also implemented
the 'dispersed
manufacturing' production strategy that has successfully maintained
the position of some leading asian producers, particularly in
Hong Kong and Taiwan. This strategy involves outsourcing the 'high
labour' stages of footwear production to countries with low labour
costs. In Europe, Romania, in particular, has been the major beneficiary
of this strategy, by recently becoming a focus for European outsourcing
of footwear production, adding to its established strengths as
a significant player in the 'Needle industries'.
Other countries, particularly United Kingdom, France
and Germany have been slower to respond to the opportunities to
outsource production, and their footwear industries are shrinking
more or less uncontrollably.
|